Better Living Through Technology: a blog dedicated to emerging
technology trends in hardware, software, webware, marketing and beyond
 

April 30th, 2007
Ed Kohler

On the drive from Minneapolis to Fort Wayne, IN today, I had a short discussion
with Jeremy where we discussed the
declining
circulation numbers
of the
Minneapolis
Star Tribune
, the largest daily newspaper in Minnesota.



When I look at large dailies, the biggest problem I see is summarized by rew in
the comments on MNSpeak:


“. . . they’re so reliant on wire services now that all the papers are 50% the
same.”



I’m not interested in wire stories in my local daily since it’s redundant
content to me. I’ve already read it online.



I look to my local paper for local information. In the case of the Minneapolis
paper, I read local news, sports, business, events, and opinions. I tend to skip
national and international news, since I get that type of news from other
sources (usually online, and before the paper arrives), and I turn to
yet
additional
sources for
hyper-local news, such as neighborhood newspapers.



The trend here is a diversification of news sources based on interest. In the
above example, the diversification is based on geographic relevancy of content,
but the same things happens regarding depth of news coverage.



One area where I’m particularly surprised by the Minneapolis Star Tribune’s
behavior is their handling of restaurant reviews. They’ve recently scaled back
the number of restaurant reporters working for the paper. Restaurant reviews are
exactly the type of content local newspapers should be able to dominate at. A
database of professional reviews of local restaurants is extraordinarily hard to
replicate. And the reviews are extraordinarily relevant to the appropriate
market.



However, as I thought about it more, it dawned on me that the largest growth
areas for daily papers in the Twin Cities are the suburbs. And suburbs don’t
have restaurants worth reviewing. It’s not like you’re going to send a reporter
out to the latest TGI Friday’s or Applebee’s in the 3rd ring suburb to compare
it to the TGI Friday’s or Applebee’s in the first and second ring ‘burbs.



Maybe newspapers are just following the money to the burbs and abandoning the
foodies in the urban core?



In response, the urban core is taking care of itself by blogging their own
restaurant reviews. Here are a few examples:




If people are passionate enough to write about an issue, they’re certainly
passionate enough to read about it. In fact, they’d probably write about what
they read.



Do you think restaurant reviews an important piece of locally produced newspaper content?

3 Responses to “ Are Restaurant Reviews Important Local Newspaper Content? ”

Posted by: John Golden on May 1st, 2007 8:27 pm

As one of the blogs you refer to in your article (thanks by the way), I think that newpaper reviews are important. I frequently refer to online articles the paper posts about restaurant closings and openings. The newspapers provide a reliable (even if you don’t agree with the review) resource to know which places are new and hot. I will often go to a new restaurant right after it is reviewed by the paper and review it myself. I find the hype around the new reataurant will drive more traffic to my blog through search engine type in traffic and feed readers.




Posted by: Tom Bartel on May 2nd, 2007 2:43 pm

Reviews in publications are important because the reputation of the publication should provide some credibility, per se. Of course, the ultimate credibility belongs to the reviewer, whatever medium, blog, website, etc. the review appears in. Often the best credibility is reserved for regular joes. That’s why we encourage restaurant reviews by anyone who wants to go to the trouble to register. So far there are over 2000 of those on The Rake’s restaurant page.




Posted by: Bill Roehl on May 3rd, 2007 11:59 am

Reviews in publications are important because the reputation of the publication should provide some credibility, per se.

I don’t trust any of the reviewers over at the Star Tribune. They have routinely proven that they are nearly incapable of matching any experience I have found at the same restaurants even days later (see El Patio in Lakeville). I would guess that the second a table orders several dinner entrees per person the kitchen staff knows what’s coming and does its best to prepare.

The “regular joes” are the best at coming down to the level of other visitors to those restaurants and that’s why they should be given far more weight than someone who is so absorbed in eating out at every restaurant in the area that they have forgotten what real food is supposed to taste like.

In the end, to each their own.




Leave a Reply

Add Webcam or
Audio-only Comment
 
Close
E-mail It